Louisiana -- Age of Sexual Consent

[Cool Teen Sites]


Updated 03-2002:
Louisiana high court refuses to strike down 200-year-old sodomy law
Thursday, March 28, 2002

(03-28) 21:07 PST NEW ORLEANS (AP) --
In a defeat for gay rights activists, the state Supreme Court refused Thursday to strike down Louisiana's nearly 200-year-old ban on sodomy.
The high court said the law does not violate the privacy right spelled out in the state's constitution. Thursday's ruling came in a civil lawsuit filed by the Louisiana Electorate of Gays and Lesbians Inc. The court issued much the same opinion in 2000 in a criminal case.

John Rawls, attorney for the gay rights group and a plaintiff in the case, lamented the ruling, and noted the law applies to heterosexuals, too.
"The Supreme Court of Louisiana has said the government can go into anyone's bedroom, including married persons, and criminalize what they are doing, even between consenting adults in private with no one watching and nobody paying for anything," he said. Attorney General Richard Ieyoub was not in his office Thursday evening when called for comment. State Rep. Tony Perkins led a successful fight against a bill to change the law last year. "The Legislature has continually upheld this statute. ... I think it's appropriate that the court recognize that the Legislature has a right to do that."

The suit also attacked the law on other grounds, including claims it discriminates against homosexuals. The high court refused to rule on those issues Thursday, meaning they remain alive before the state 4th Circuit Court of Appeal in a separate action.
(Source:   http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/03/28/national0007EST0401.DTL)



[EDITOR NOTE:  Updated 07-10-00]

Louisiana just had a 5-2 Supreme Court decision maintaining the illegality of sodomy, regardless of the gender, age, or marital status of the participants.    See the site:
Just thought you might be interested.


Appeals court strikes down Louisiana law banning oral and anal sex
The Associated Press 02/12/99 7:38 PM Eastern

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- An appeals court has thrown out a 194-year-old Louisiana sodomy law, saying non-commercial oral and anal sex is protected by the right to privacy in the state constitution. The state 4th Circuit Court of Appeal issued the 3-0 ruling Tuesday, reversing the 1996 conviction of Mitchell E. Smith. He had been accused of raping a woman but found guilty under the state's "crimes against nature" statute only of having her perform oral sex. "There can be no doubt that the right of consenting adults to engage in private non-commercial sexual activity, free from governmental interference, is protected by the privacy clause of the Louisiana Constitution," the judges wrote. The law makes anal and oral sex between consenting adults felonies punishable by up to five years in prison. It dates from 1805, just after Louisiana was purchased by the United States. Gay rights groups praised the ruling, saying it decriminalizes their only sexual options. The law applies equally to homosexuals and heterosexuals, but gay men and lesbians say it targets them. "It's a great legal ruling," said Suzanne Goldberg, a lawyer with the Lamda Legal Defense and Education Fund. "It is completely consistent with rulings by other courts nationwide striking down these laws as outrageous invasions of privacy." The decision will be appealed, said Orleans Parish First District Attorney Tim McElroy. "This is not about gay rights," McElroy said. "We are doing this as a means of restoring to the victim what small victory she received in court." Smith's lawyer didn't immediately return a telephone message. The decision reversed Smith's conviction and his sentence, a three-year suspended jail term and two years probation. The judges said they examined constitutional cases on sodomy laws in other states, rejecting arguments sodomy is immoral, discourages procreation and leads to short-lived and shallow relationships. "We find that discouraging acts that cannot lead to procreation is not a compelling state interest nor even a constitutionally valid justification for the state's invasion of the right to privacy," the judges wrote. They also cited a 6-1 decision by the Georgia Supreme Court last November striking down that state's sodomy law, also because of privacy rights guaranteed in the state constitution. The decision means there are now 11 states that still ban oral and anal sex between consenting adults. Five other states ban such sex between homosexuals only, Goldberg said. She predicted that the case would be appealed. But it's unclear whether the case would make it to the Louisiana Supreme Court before another challenge to the state's sodomy law. That case involves a lawsuit filed in state court. It raises privacy concerns, but also contends that the sodomy law unfairly targets gays for punishment and legitimizes hatred of homosexuals. Judge Carolyn Gill-Jefferson presided over a four-day trial in October, but has not issued a ruling. Lawyers for the state Attorney General's Office presented one witness, a pyschotherapist who said he "heals" gay men and lesbians. State lawyers were notified about Smith's case before the appeals court and given an opportunity to participate, but didn't, the judges wrote. Supporters of Louisiana's sodomy law said they will consider pushing for a referendum on the issue if the law is struck down by the Louisiana Supreme Court.





07-2000 New Source: U.S. statutory rape laws is published on the Web by the National
Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. The booklet, which
requires Adobe Acrobat to read, is located at:













NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:   Copyright holders:  We are not trying to assert any rights to your article.  We operate as a repository with a virtually unlimited storage capacity.  We capture and store articles to prevent loss due to system crashes and the space limitations that most sites operate under.  We will remove your article if you wish.  This is a non-profit site.  AgeOfConsent.com is a repository of both legal and commentary information on laws relating to sexual activity.  We do not, and can not offer any legal advice or provide any legal counsel.  Do not write to us requesting our advice or suggestions -- your email will be ignored.  This web site and its contents are in no way affiliated, funded, or regulated by any Local, State, Federal or International government agency or governing body.  Information contained on this site has been provided by readers and/or has been discovered through the research of volunteers.  Other than cursory review, no efforts have been made to independently verify the current status of the legal statutes contained in these page nor whether any cases used as examples are still precedent.   Do not rely on this information to make legal decisions.  You should contact a legal advisor in your area for a proper determination of law on any questions you might have.  Any emails and other user comments and opinions included on this site are the opinions of the creator of the message and are not necessarily those of this site, its editors, advertisers or other affiliated entities.